SERVICES
Complementary services built on Full Stack .NET development experience
I support developers, teams, and companies on .NET, architecture, code quality, performance, and knowledge-sharing topics as an extension of hands-on modern web development practice.
Who is this for?
Who is this for?
Teams facing maintainability issues
Companies preparing an architecture evolution
Technical leaders looking to structure engineering practices
SERVICES
Core services
These services are grounded in practical experience designing, developing, maintaining, and shipping .NET applications.
.NET and architecture mentoring
Personalized guidance to improve your technical skills, make stronger architecture decisions, and progress through real-world cases.
Includes
- code reviews
- architecture design
- technical interview preparation
- support on a real project
- personalized learning plan
- .NET best practices
Technical audit and architecture review
A structured review of your codebase, architecture, and engineering practices to identify risks, bottlenecks, and priority improvements.
Includes
- code quality
- architecture
- performance
- security
- technical debt
- testing
- observability
- prioritized recommendations
Deliverables
- audit report
- risk summary
- improvement roadmap
- review session
.NET and software architecture training
Practical training adapted to your team’s level, focused on real cases, exercises, demonstrations, and immediately applicable best practices.
Possible topics
- ASP.NET Core
- Clean Architecture
- DDD
- Entity Framework Core
- unit and integration testing
- performance
- REST APIs
- security
- Docker
- C# best practices
Formats
- short workshop
- one-day training
- multi-session program
- custom training
Guided development and team support
Collaborative support during project delivery to improve technical decisions, transfer best practices, and increase team autonomy.
Includes
- initial architecture
- pull request reviews
- pair programming
- technical decisions
- testing practices
- delivery strategy
- documentation
- team upskilling
Process
How does the engagement work?
Initial discussion
We clarify the context, constraints, and goals.
Assessment
I review the situation and identify priorities.
Action plan
We define the format, milestones, and expected outcomes.
Support
We move forward through regular sessions and practical recommendations.
Outcomes
What you get
- clearer technical decisions
- more maintainable code
- better-structured architecture
- earlier risk detection
- more autonomous teams
- practices you can apply immediately
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which service should I choose?
The right format depends on the context: individual growth, an existing project, a team to train, or architecture decisions to clarify. A first discussion helps scope the need.
Do you only work with .NET?
My core expertise is the .NET ecosystem, but architecture, quality, testing, and team practices can also apply to connected environments.
Are engagements remote?
Yes, engagements can be organized remotely. The exact format depends on the need, the team, and the project constraints.
Can you support an existing project?
Yes. Audits, architecture reviews, mentoring sessions, and team support can start from an existing codebase or technical context.
Do you provide team training?
Yes. Training can be adapted to the team’s level and focused on your real cases instead of a generic program.
How long does an audit take?
The duration depends on the size of the project, the scope, and the depth expected. The initial framing helps define a realistic format.
Can we start with a short discussion?
Yes. A short discussion is a good way to clarify the context, challenges, and most suitable support format.
Need an external perspective on your project?
Share your context, challenges, and goals. Together, we will identify the most suitable support format.